Sonnet 11
is - well, a sonnet. And all that a sonnet form implies.
It is
from a collection of poems called Pamphilius to Amphilanthus. A
quick google search will bring up a long list of possible resources.
Wroth was
primarily concerned with gender roles throughout this sonnet series, and the
series itself is not truly original. Critics seem widely convinced that
the series is based on a work of Sir Philip Sidney's, a collection known
as Astrophil and Stella. On that point,
Jennifer Laws writes:
And
yet, when I actually read Pamphilia to Amphilanthus, what strikes me is not its
similarity to Astrophil and Stella, but its differences, particularly in
relation to gender issues. In place of the lively and at times even assertive
Stella, there is the passive and victimised Pamphilia who cannot free herself
from the perfidious Amphilanthus. Whereas Sidney seems deliberately to break
sonnet conventions by creating not so much an idealised representation of
remote feminine beauty as a living responsive human being who can act, Wroth
allows her woman to remain inactive and helpless, the victim of another's
behaviour. And this is in spite of the fact that the woman in Wroth's sequence
has become the poet/narrator; no longer an object, she is now the speaking
subject. The opportunities one might imagine that this reversal of roles could
bring -- either for female wooing or for the scornful rejection of unwanted
male attention -- are simply passed by. Pamphilia remains throughout
unfulfilled and yet a model of patient constancy.
(Laws,
1996)
One of the Pamphilius
to Amphilanthus online resources, written by Richard
Bear, has a very informative introduction on Lady Mary Wroth's life and works.
He notes:
Mary
Sidney was married in 1604 to Sir Robert Wroth. The match apparently was not a
happy one {4}. Her husband ran up massive debts and died
in 1614, leaving the young widow to apply to the King for relief from her
creditors. She had one child from her marriage, who died at about the age of
two, and two "natural" children whose father was William Herbert,
Earl of Pembroke, her first cousin and very probably the person in her life for
whom Amphilanthus is a persona.
(Bear,
1992)
It is
important to note that in this sonnet series, Lady Wroth is subtly subverting - though not reversing! - the
classical Petrarchan model of a male in passionate romantic pursuit of the
female love-interest.
The
sequence opens with the dream vision of Pamphilia, whose name means
"all-loving," in which she describes the triumph of Venus and Cupid
over her heart. The first section of 55 poems reveals Pamphilia's conflicting
emotions as she attempts to resolve the struggle between passionate surrender
and self-affirmation. The Petrarchan model of the male lover wooing a cold,
unpitying lady posed a genuine challenge to Wroth, who could not simply reverse
the gender roles. Instead of presenting her female persona in active pursuit of
Amphilanthus, whose name means "lover of two," Wroth completely omits
the Petrarchan rhetoric of wooing and courtship. She addresses most of the
sonnets to Cupid, night, grief, fortune, or time, rather than directly to Amphilanthus,
whose name appears only in the title of the sequence.
(Extract
from larger article on The Poetry Foundation website. Useful
stuff there.)
Hope this
helps!
For
further reading on Lady Mary Wroth, see this article by Carolyn Campbell, 2001.
- T. Marcus
No comments:
Post a Comment